We Made the Playbook: ACOG Just Told OB-GYNs to Partner With Doulas (And I Am Not Okay, In the Best Way)
- Rebekah Porter

- Aug 7
- 4 min read
I have been sitting here for twenty minutes trying to figure out how to start this post without sounding like I'm shouting, and I've decided: let me shout a little. This month, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists released a brand-new committee statement called "Partnering with Doulas in Clinical Settings." And doulas, my friends, we are in it. Not as a footnote.... Not as a "nice extra" a client mentions apologetically at their 36-week appointment..... As part of the guidance itself.

Wait, doulas helped write this?
Yes. This is the part that made me actually gasp. "The statement was authored jointly by OB-GYNs and practicing doulas, and it is endorsed by DONA International, Doula Trainings International, the National Black Doulas Association, and the National Health Law Program". For years, so much of my job has involved translating — explaining to a nervous partner what a Pitocin drip is, explaining to a resident why my client needs five more minutes before she pushes, explaining to myself why the system doesn't seem to know what to do with me. Having doula voices literally in the authorship of a national clinical guideline feels like someone finally handed us a seat at the table we've been quietly holding up folding chairs to reach for years.
The evidence has been there. Now it's official.
Here's the thing that keeps me up at night in the good way: none of this is new information to those of us who've been in the room. We've watched labors shorten. We've watched cesarean rates drop for our clients. We've watched a first latch go smoothly because someone was calm and present through the whole thing. ACOG is now saying the same thing, in their own language, with their own research behind it: "doula support is linked to shorter labors, fewer cesarean deliveries, better breastfeeding initiation rates, and greater birth satisfaction". It is genuinely moving to see something I have felt in my body, in hundreds of birth rooms, written into a document that clinicians across the country are going to read.
And they're naming the bigger picture too. With maternal mortality still far too high in this country, ACOG is pointing to doula care as a proven, affordable way to chip away at the health inequities that have made pregnancy and birth so much more dangerous for some families than others. That is not a small thing to say out loud, officially, as an organization that sets the standard of care for OB-GYNs nationwide. This is especially important in TN where we rank 50th in the US for Maternal Mortality Rates.
What actually changes for me, at work, tomorrow?
I want to be honest — this guidance doesn't hand me a badge that gets me automatic respect in every hospital hallway. But it gives me something almost as powerful: language, and backup. The statement lays out real, practical "swim lanes" so nobody's confused about who does what. As one doula writer put it beautifully, clinicians hold the medical safety — the diagnosing, the monitoring, the procedures — while doulas hold the continuous, non-medical bridge: physical comfort, steady presence, information, advocacy. Two different jobs, both essential, finally drawn out on the same map instead of doulas having to justify our presence in the room from scratch with every new nurse or resident.
ACOG is also asking OB-GYNs to actually learn what we do — our scope, our training, the different flavors of doula work out there — because most medical education has simply never covered it. They're being asked to build real relationships and communication with us, not just tolerate us standing quietly in the corner. And they're being encouraged to push back on the paperwork and institutional red tape that keeps doula care out of reach for the families who often need it most.

The access piece matters more than people realize
If you've worked with families on public insurance, you already know this next part in your gut: doula care has too often been a luxury good, available mostly to people who can pay out of pocket. The guidance doesn't shy away from that. It points to research showing that people with public insurance are almost twice as likely to want doula support and not be able to get it, compared to those with private insurance. ACOG naming that gap, and pointing clinicians toward the different ways doula care can actually be paid for — flat fees, stipends, salaried hospital-based doula roles, grant funding — feels like a genuine nudge toward making this kind of support something every birthing person can access, not just the ones who already have resources.
Why I'm letting myself be this excited
I've learned to be cautiously optimistic about "guidance" documents. A statement isn't a mandate, and culture change in hospitals is slow, and I know I'll still have to introduce myself to a skeptical charge nurse at 3 am sometime this year. But this is real movement. It's an acknowledgment, from the top of the OB-GYN profession, that the softest, most human parts of birth — the hand-holding, the reassurance, the fierce quiet advocacy — aren't separate from good medicine. They're part of it.
So if you're a fellow doula reading this: keep showing up exactly as you have been. The evidence just got a very official stamp, and it was worth the wait.
And if you're pregnant and wondering whether a doula is "worth it" or whether your OB-GYN will be open to it — I'd tell you to bring this up at your next appointment. The tide is turning, and you deserve a whole team in your corner.
This was based off the information printed here: https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2026/07/new-guidance-for-ob-gyns-on-partnering-with-doulas


Comments